Tuesday, April 15, 2008

Vaccines, what's a parent to do?

A reader writes:
I was wondering if you would post information or discussion about vaccinations or what you have learned with your kiddies. I wrestled with my first one about them and after research, prayer, and conversation decided to continue with them. Lately, I have some friends who are very ANTI-vaccine and have pushed the issue with me. I have heard a lot lately in the media with the link to autism and then was sent this article today (article omitted). Reading this makes me NOT want to continue....but very curious to know other discussion or views on it. Thanks...and God Bless and thanks to all of you for your open blog where we can share and learn from one another!

The vaccine topic is huge. HUGE. There is a tremendous amount of information out there about vaccines, and unfortunately, much of it is sensationalized and lacking in useful or accurate information for parents. I’m going to humbly attempt to address this topic by breaking the issue down into two distinct topics: 1) What does the Church teach about when a parent can ethically vaccinate their children? and 2) Should parents vaccinate their children, from a medical/health perspective?

This post will address only issue #1 and I will save issue #2 for another post. Please keep in mind that I am not a doctor, nor do I have any formal training in moral theology. I am simply a mom who has read a lot about this topic and, like the rest of you, is trying to make decisions in the best interests of my children.

As some of you may already know, various vaccines are derived from the use of aborted fetal tissues. In the United States, the vaccines for Rubella, Hepatitis A, Chicken Pox, Polio, Rabies, and Smallpox are all derived from aborted fetal tissues. In the US, (as of 2005) there are no options for ethically acceptable vaccinations against rubella, chickenpox, and hepatitis A. (Ethically produced alternatives do exist for polio, rabies, and smallpox.) Ethically produced alternatives also exist for rubella and hep. A in other nations, but not in the US. As of 2005 there was not an ethically produced vaccination for chicken pox anywhere.

In light of these facts, the Pontifical Academy for Life, a commission of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, issued a statement in 2005 entitled Moral Reflections on Vaccines Prepared From Cells Derived From Aborted Human Foetuses. To date this is the best and most relevant church document on the topic of vaccinations, and in my humble opinion, a must read.

In regards to doctors and parents who use the vaccines, the document states:
...doctors or parents who resort to the use of these vaccines for their children, in spite of knowing their origin (voluntary abortion), carry out a form of very remote mediate material cooperation, and thus very mild, in the performance of the original act of abortion.

Put simply, the Church teaches that by using these vaccines, you are not intentionally advancing the evil of abortion, and your unintentional contribution to the problem is very minimal. At the same time, however, we have a duty to combat the evil of using babies to make vaccines.
Therefore, doctors and fathers of families have a duty to take recourse to alternative vaccines (if they exist), putting pressure on the political authorities and health systems so that other vaccines without moral problems become available. They should take recourse, if necessary, to the use of conscientious objection with regard to the use of vaccines produced by means of cell lines of aborted human foetal origin.

So obviously, if alternative vaccines are available, we should use them. But in the US, alternative vaccines are not available for rubella (found in the MMR shot), chicken pox, and Hepatitis A. So what is a parent to do? The document addresses this issue next:
As regards the diseases against which there are no alternative vaccines which are available and ethically acceptable, it is right to abstain from using these vaccines if it can be done without causing children, and indirectly the population as a whole, to undergo significant risks to their health.

So the document, in effect, provides a balancing test of sorts for parents questioning the use of an unethically produced vaccine. The more serious the disease, the more morally justifiable is the parents’ decision to vaccinate. The less serious the disease, the more likely a parent should choose an alternative route, such as conscientious objection.

This distinction has played out in our personal family decisions. We chose (or will choose) to vaccinate our children against rubella (although for medical reasons I will discuss in a future post, not until they are older than 3), because we feel that rubella poses a significant health risk to the general population. Luckily, my pediatrician does not routinely recommend the Hep. A vaccine for children, so I don’t have to make a decision on the Hep. A vaccine.

By contrast, we have decided against giving our children the chickenpox vaccine because we do not feel the disease is a grave enough threat to public health to warrant cooperation in the evil of abortion. Although, I will confess that I did give the vaccine to Gianna prior to my knowledge of this issue. Charlie did not receive the vaccination, Augustine will not receive the vaccination, and none of my future children will receive the vaccination, unless the drug companies develop a line of vaccines that are not derived from aborted fetal tissue—or our conscience changes through more prayer and research.

Our family has made this decision in light of this Church document, other information we have gathered about vaccinations (topic of a future post), consultation with our pediatrician, and prayer. And of course, we make no claim of infallibility. I think this is one of those issues where there isn't necessarily a "right" choice that applies to every family, particularly since individual health concerns are going to be different for each family, and perhaps different among siblings of the same family.

In summary, I think it is important that all parents take this issue seriously. We, as Catholics, have a duty to properly form our conscience. Just following the vaccine schedule of your pediatrician, no questions asked, is probably not enough to properly form your conscience on this issue. While it may not be possible to read every document on a given topic, and it may in fact be difficult to wade through the sea of information about vaccines, we must at least make an effort to educate ourselves about the moral issues involved in the debate. Then, through prayer and consultation, make the best decision for each of our children.

In the coming weeks I will do another post on the health/medical concerns involved with vaccinations...stay tuned!


4ddintx said...

Thanks for this post! I'm on a yahoogroup of Catholic moms that is discussing this issue right now. There is so much information to wade through.

I look forward to your next post.

Katherine said...

I am not surprised, but I can't say I knew about vaccines coming from aborted children. One thing confuses me though...

Are you saying that the original vaccine was made from aborted children or that every single dose of that vaccine is made from aborted children? While I would find the former repulsive, I would say what is done is done and refusing it now won't make any difference but the latter is gravely disturbing.

4ddintx said...

If you look at the website:
it outlines the use of the aborted child. The aborted child was used in the original cell line. Another aborted child was used to keep that cell line alive. Now, those original cell lines are nearing (have reached?) an end and so new abortions had to be procured. It's all outlined clearly at that site.

4ddintx said...

Sorry, that's www.cogforlife.org

elena said...

Until the arrival of our fourth child we had unquestioningly followed the recommended vaccination schedule. However, after our fourth child's first vaccinations, we have stopped our children's vaccinations for the time being. The reason was primarily due to a reaction to the vaccine that brought the autism link close to home. After much prayer and discussion we discontinued the vaccinations. However, the physical reaction made me look a little further into areas that I had previously neglected and which I believe Red will further address (i.e. are vaccinations really necessary? are they detrimental to our children's health, especially the state of their immune systems? are we trading measles and mumps for childhood cancers etc.?) Such health realted issues also led me to look more into the abortion-vaccination link and I thank you, Red,for the link to the pertinent document.

Right Said Red said...

I believe 4ddintx cleared things up, but just in case there is still confusion--

the original vaccine was made from aborted fetal cell lines. The manufacturers are not killing new babies to make each vaccine (that would be really insane!), but they are using the cell lines from the original aborted baby. The problem obviously arises in that we are allowing the companies to profit from this grave sin, and in addition, we are profiting via the vaccine. Thus, we are in a sense mildly cooperating in the evil of abortion. I hope that makes sense.

Anonymous said...

Not being a Catholic... I am glad the Church allows for the reasonable trade that I would expect from such a thoughtful group..i.e lets look and see if the potential for a serious outbreak is worth being mildly complicit in the making of the vaccine. It's a serious issue. Here in Tucson we have had outbreaks of whooping cough and measles most likely from a poorly vaccinated population and I believe a few years ago there was an Amish group that lost a lot of kids to a polio outbreak for the same reason.

JStark said...

I had the mumps when I was a kid. Big deal. I also had the measles too. Big deal. I am 44.

Stick to the stuff that matters and quit the panic.

The pro life folks stick this stuff so we can't see the war forest from the trees. Being pro-life is not just about abortion.

All they want us to do is PANIC.

Consider the scrupulous source.